July 21, 2005

Stopping Suicide Attacks

Filed under: Foreign Policy — Danny @ 11:02 pm

In light of the recent attacks in London, it seems that some people are finally asking tough questions about suicide attacks. People are wanting to know what motivates the attackers, and how the attacks can be stopped.

On July 14th, in a speech on the floor of the House, Ron Paul cited research from the book Dying to Win by Robert Pape. Pape’s exhaustive research shows that our intervention in the Middle East leads to these attacks. Here’s a great quote from Paul’s speech:

The clincher is this: the strongest motivation, according to Pape, is not religion but rather a desire “to compel modern democracies to withdraw military forces from the territory the terrorists view as their homeland.”

The best news is that if stopping suicide terrorism is a goal we seek, a solution is available to us. Cease the occupation of foreign lands and the suicide missions will cease. Between 1982 and 1986, there were 41 suicide terrorist attacks in Lebanon. Once the U.S., the French, and Israel withdrew their forces from Lebanon, there were no more attacks. The reason the attacks stop, according to Pape, is that the Osama bin Ladens of the world no longer can inspire potential suicide terrorists despite their continued fanatical religious beliefs.

The mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, provides another example. He recently said that intervention in the Middle East by Western nations, motivated by oil, along with oppression has caused spawned suicide attacks. Here’s a quote:

“I think we have just had 80 years of Western intervention in predominantly Arab lands because of the Western need for oil.”

“We have propped up unsavoury governments, we have overthrown ones that we didn’t consider sympathetic.”

“And I think the particular problem we have at the moment is that in the 1980s the Americans recruited and trained Osama bin Laden, taught him how to kill, to make bombs and sent him off to kill the Russians in Afghanistan and they didn’t give any thought to the fact that once he had done that, he might turn on his creators.”

The London attacks were truly a tragic event. I am amazed to see someone as close to those events as the mayor of London mentioning that Britain may have actually had a hand in causing them. I can’t imagine that the public want’s to hear that right now, so it seems pretty courageous for Mr. Livingstone to come out and say it.

Can you imagine if Rudolph Giuliani had said something like this after 9/11?

4 Comments »

  1. The events are unfortunate but an examination of the facts shows things just do not add up. Even the mainstream media was questioning the official story up until today’s second round of attacks. Yes we commit evil on the middle east, and yes we are reaping what we sow, I just feel the source of much of the terrorism is controlled and directed much closer to home.

    Comment by stopthenwo — July 22, 2005 @ 2:23 am

  2. Are our Western actions in the Middle East creating terrorists? Well, we are certainly helping their recruitment numbers, however don’t be fooled into thinking this confrontation wasn’t inevitable. Without getting too deep into Islamic principles, I will just say that there is a deep seated hatred and intolerance at the heart of the dogma. This is not to say that all Moslems share the same interpretations of their dogma but it is there nevertheless. It took at least 5 years of planning for the 9/11 attacks…..

    Comment by Overhere — July 25, 2005 @ 6:58 am

  3. How exactly do we get people to see this? I do hope young people are sufficiently emotionally distanced from the Cold War to see the truth about our current situation: that it is the direct result of the imperialist policies of previous generations.

    Overhere, this confrontation was hardly inevitable. Take a look at the Old Testament, and see that by your logic, we ought to be in a continual confrontation with Jewish and other Israeli forces. The Jews are quite capable of recognizing that the Old Testament requirement to destroy pagan altars, exterminate and/or enslave non-Jawehists, and generally occupy the Holy Land, were requirements of a previous era. Why not Muslims?

    Muhammed was friendly to Jews and Christians, after all…

    Comment by Daryl Sawyer — August 16, 2005 @ 1:24 pm

  4. car company ct insurance…

    brier:handle annuals Munsey smoother …

    Trackback by car company ct insurance — July 5, 2008 @ 7:25 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment


Powered by WordPress. Theme by H P Nadig